The Preliminary Meeting in Arbitration acts as a linchpin in both institutional (guided by pre-established procedures) and ad-hoc arbitration frameworks. More than just a logistical arrangement, this meeting is crucial for strategy, preparation, and building mutual trust among arbitrators, legal counsel, and the parties involved. It’s not just concerned with basic aspects, such as setting dates. Instead, it promises clarity, trust, and a mutual understanding that will resonate throughout the arbitration. In this sixth entry of our series, “Understanding Arbitration: A Guide for Businesses,” we cover the preliminary meeting’s multifaceted nature, offering a window into how it shapes the arbitration’s trajectory.

Understanding the Preliminary Meeting

The preliminary or ‘case management’ meeting is a vital step in the arbitration process, fostering a collaborative atmosphere that starkly contrasts the potential adversarial nature of the substantive hearings. This meeting establishes the principles of transparency, efficiency, and the overarching ethos of the entire arbitration. The discussions about rules, timelines, or other nuances offer a telling glimpse into the progression and direction the arbitration might take. As such, this session sets the arbitration’s tone and trajectory.

Benefits of the Preliminary Meeting in Arbitration

    • Establishing Rapport: These meetings act as catalysts, engendering camaraderie between the parties and the tribunal. This serves as an invaluable prelude, ushering in mutual respect and understanding before the crux of formal proceedings unfolds.
    • Efficient Time Management: The arbitration process becomes streamlined by ironing out procedural intricacies beforehand. This proactive step ensures stakeholders can direct their focus and energies towards the heart of the dispute.
    • Customisation of Efficiency: The preliminary meeting provides an unparalleled opportunity to tailor the arbitration process to the specific needs and preferences of the involved parties. This customised approach promotes a more fluid and effective resolution mechanism.

Key Topics to address During the Meeting

Outlined below are the key topics that form a clear arbitration framework:

1. Foundation and Jurisdictional Considerations:

    • Agreement to Arbitrate: It is vital to validate that both parties have willingly chosen arbitration as their dispute resolution method. This confirmation establishes the tribunal’s authority over the dispute.

2. Procedural and Administrative Details:

    • Procedural Timetable: Establish a detailed procedural timetable. This guide will set out all the phases, from initial pleadings to final hearings, ensuring systematic progress.
    • Administrative and Logistical Details: Addressing the practical side of the arbitration, discussions should cover aspects such as selecting the right venue, ensuring technology is in place for smooth virtual interactions, and the possible appointment of an administrative secretary to aid tribunal tasks.
    • Fees and Financial Matters: The preliminary meeting also discusses financial arrangements:
      • Ad Hoc Arbitration: Ad Hoc arbitration has no set fee structure. During the meeting, arbitrators’ fees, based on mutual agreement, will be determined. Expected administrative costs will also be highlighted for transparency. The deposit system will also be covered to ensure the tribunal’s financial stability.
      • Institutional Arbitration: Institutional arbitration has a transparent fee system. The fee structure will be presented, covering both arbitrators’ and administrative costs. The institution’s deposit system, ensuring methodical payments, will be explained.

3. Procedural Specifics:

    • Language: Given the international nature of arbitration, deciding on the primary language for proceedings is essential. Any requirements for interpreters or document translation will also be discussed.
    • Mode of Hearing: Choices vary between an in-depth hearing with witnesses and documentation or a more streamlined, document-focused method. This meeting will finalise the chosen format.
    • Witness Statements and Evidentiary Matters: Outline how witness statements will be presented (e.g., written, orally) and set clear criteria for submitting evidence. The extent of document disclosure will also be finalised to maintain clarity and transparency. 
    • Interim Measures or Emergency Relief: The potential for interim actions or emergency reliefs will be discussed for urgent situations that may demand prompt action. This ensures all parties remain protected throughout the arbitration process.

The Arbitrator’s Role

The arbitrator’s role guides the arbitration towards a resolution that embodies fairness, efficiency, and transparency.

From the start, the arbitrator ensures each participant understands their rights and responsibilities, preventing potential pitfalls and misunderstandings. Their consistent display of impartiality and procedural fairness establishes trust and sets a benchmark for professional conduct throughout the arbitration.

Central to their role, they uphold core principles: ensuring efficiency, fairness, and utmost confidentiality in proceedings. As stewards of the process’s integrity, their leadership moulds the overall atmosphere and ethos of the arbitration.

The Parties’ Responsibility

Parties play a vital role in arbitration and must uphold these duties:

Active Engagement: Arbitration requires full participation. Each party should promptly provide details, address queries, and express their views. This ensures everyone, including the arbitrator, grasps all perspectives.

Forecasting Issues: Parties should identify potential complications, such as witness availability, technical needs, or scheduling challenges, well in advance to prevent disruptions.

Promptly Seeking Clarity: If there is any uncertainty in the proceedings, parties should quickly request clarification, maintaining alignment and preventing post-award disagreements.

While the arbitrator steers the process, the parties define its course.

Navigating Challenges: Potential Issues and Solutions

International arbitrations can pose challenges, necessitating tailored solutions to maintain fairness and efficiency:

Time Zone Considerations: When parties are globally dispersed, coordinating times is critical. Using a shared calendar that shows everyone’s preferred slots and rotating meeting times can ensure no one always meets at inconvenient hours.

Ensuring Fair Representation: Giving each party a reasonable opportunity to articulate its position is critical in arbitration. While time allocations might differ, the focus is on equitable treatment. Arbitrators ensure fairness by adjusting speaking durations based on content depth and regularly checking in with participants.

Cultural Differences: Diverse cultures bring unique norms. Arbitrators and parties should know these differences to avoid misunderstandings and ensure mutual respect.

Confidentiality Concerns: With varied rules across jurisdictions, it’s crucial to establish clarity on what information stays confidential. Everyone should understand and adhere to these confidentiality guidelines.

Proactively addressing these factors simplifies the arbitration process and strengthens its credibility, ensuring every party feels valued and understood.

Post-Preliminary Meeting Steps

The preliminary meeting’s conclusion is just the beginning of a pivotal phase in the arbitration process.

Documenting Outcomes: It is vital to capture the decisions from the meeting. This documentation, often termed ‘minutes’ or a ‘procedural order’, is a binding reference, preventing potential disagreements and keeping stakeholders on the same page.

Drafting a Roadmap: Discussions from the meeting should result in a defined plan for the next arbitration stages. This roadmap, outlining major milestones and expected timelines, helps parties align their efforts and lends structure to the process.

Maintaining Open Channels: Keeping open communication channels post-meeting is key. It is crucial to have established means of communication for smooth information flow. Periodic follow-up meetings can also help in addressing emerging concerns promptly.

Overall, post-meeting actions are crucial in laying the groundwork for a streamlined, transparent, and efficient arbitration, underlining the commitment made during the initial talks.

Final Thoughts

The preliminary meeting is the cornerstone of the arbitration framework, with its thorough conduct significantly shaping subsequent stages of the arbitration. Given its central role, participants should approach it with diligence and genuine collaboration, aiming for a straightforward and effective arbitration process.


The insights presented in this blog post aim to furnish readers with a broad understanding of arbitration within the context of global business. This material does not purport to provide legal advice, but rather serves as an informative resource. Specific decisions concerning arbitration and its relevance should always be made in consultation with qualified legal experts. Given the intricate variations and legal implications of arbitration across different jurisdictions, it is paramount to collaborate with legal professionals well-acquainted with the precise legal framework pertinent to your circumstances.

If you find this content valuable and have further questions, or if you require guidance on the detailed aspects of arbitration, please feel free to reach out to our dedicated team at We stand ready to guide you through these processes and address any areas of concern.

Isaiah Bozimo

Isaiah Bozimo


Daniel Ihueze

Daniel Ihueze

Senior Associate

Share This